Sessions Says Guantánamo Is a ‘Very Fine Place’ for New Suspects

“There’s plenty of space,” Mr. Sessions said of the prison. “We are well equipped for it. It’s a perfect place for it. Eventually, this will be decided by the military rather than the Justice Department. But I see no legal problem whatsoever with doing that.”

As a senator, Mr. Sessions was a critic of former President Barack Obama’s efforts to close the prison and his refusal to bring any new captives to it. But Mr. Sessions’s remarks, in an interview with the conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt, were his first extensive public comments on the topic since becoming attorney general last month.

Mr. Hewitt did not raise the question of whether the United States would seek to take custody of Abu Khaybar, who is suspected of being a Qaeda militant and was captured last fall in Yemen by another country, nor what should happen to terrorism suspects who are American citizens. Mr. Trump said during the campaign that he was “fine” with sending Americans to Guantánamo.

But Mr. Hewitt brought up the troubles of the military commissions system operating at Guantánamo, in which the death penalty case against Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four others accused of conspiring in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has been mired in years of pretrial hearings with no actual trial yet in sight.

Mr. Hewitt observed that the commissions system “is not getting them to trial” and called it “kind of a scandal that no one has faced justice 15 years later.” He asked Mr. Sessions whether he expected to accelerate the process.

Mr. Sessions told Mr. Hewitt that he had asked a “good question.” And while the attorney general reiterated his support for the idea of military prosecutions of Qaeda members, he also said it was time to think through “to what extent we’re going to use military commissions.”

“We’ve got to get the military on board,” Mr. Sessions said. “By now, we should have worked through all the legal complications that the Obama administration seemed to allow to linger and never get decided, so nothing ever happened. So it is time for us in the months to come to get this thing figured out and start using it in an effective way.”

Mr. Sessions did not explain what he thought the military had done wrong, nor what he was suggesting as an alternative. But he pointed out that there is no need to prosecute anyone at Guantánamo in the sense that the detainees can be held in open-ended detention without trial while the war continues.

And he spoke disparagingly of transferring the Sept. 11 case to civilian court, which the Obama administration wanted to do before Congress barred transferring detainees onto domestic soil for prosecution.

“In general, I don’t think we’re better off bringing these people to federal court in New York and trying them in federal court where they get discovery rights to find out our intelligence, and get court-appointed lawyers and things of that nature,” he said.

The two factors Mr. Sessions identified are not unique to civilian trials. The commissions system’s rules for discovery of intelligence are modeled after civilian courts’ rules, which are set by the Classified Information Procedures Act. And defendants in the military commissions system get government-provided defense lawyers, too.

Mr. Sessions’s interview came in a week in which the Trump White House twice put forth false information about Guantánamo.

On Tuesday, Mr. Trump falsely said on Twitter that “122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield.” But 113 of the 121 former detainees deemed to be “confirmed” recidivists by the intelligence community were transferred under the Bush administration.

At a briefing on Wednesday, the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, acknowledged that Mr. Trump had gotten that wrong, but then falsely said that “most” releases under former President George W. Bush were “court-ordered.” But habeas corpus rulings accounted for only three of the 532 ex-detainees transferred by the Bush administration.

Stay Informed:

Trump to Seek $54 Billion Increase in Military Spending

Trump seeking $54B increase in defense spending, cuts elsewhere

US Military Spending


Cancer and Cannabis

(How to) Dark Web

(How to) Beat Stingray

Big Pharma and You

Autism in American public schools

How to Find out who's a Snitch

Police Tactics and How to Beat them

How to Verify what is real and how to spot a fake

How to Beat any drug test

Buy Marijuana Online

Torture Inc. Americas Brutal Prisons

Cops Are Corrupt (by city/state)

US Military atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gitmo far worse than Nazi Germany

LEAK College Textbook downloads

Afghan Heroin & the CIA

Heroin Do's and Don'ts

Streetwalker Do's and Don'ts

Military Nudes Uncensored   


Popular posts from this blog

10 Facts about the Syrian conflict you won't hear on the main stream media

Trump's promised veterans hotline not set up nearly 4 months later

FAKE NEWS: US accuses Syria of mass executions and burning the bodies