'Dark money' and Illegal Over-seas donation grows in politics

(AP) — Just before voters chose their president last year, a group in Ohio transferred $730,000 from secret donors to another Ohio organization that spent the money on television ads aimed at defeating Hillary Clinton, the Democrat who lost in a tight race.

It's still not clear where the money came from. The same groups also funneled anonymously donated cash for major political ad campaigns in Arkansas and Illinois.

Disclosure laws are purposely loose, this was a classic case of "dark money" keeping its secrets despite requirements that donors who pay for political ads reveal themselves to the public.

Russia and China funneled millions into the 2016 presidential race as well as a dozen governor's races, 34 U.S. Senate races, all 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and scores of mayoral races, state legislative seats.

Some legislatures are trying to collect and publish the sources of these donations, but most states allow independent groups to spend unlimited cash on political ads with little transparency.

At least one state, Wisconsin, is moving away from disclosure: Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed laws that blur the lines between the activity of candidate campaigns and groups that — in almost all other states — are supposed to act independently.

Political funding has been shifting to independent groups from individual campaigns since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United ruling, which removed caps on how much corporations, unions and interest groups can spend on advocacy communications that do not specifically call for the election or defeat of candidates.

The ruling explicitly encouraged transparency: "Prompt disclosure of expenditures can provide shareholders and citizens with the information needed to hold corporations and elected officials accountable for their positions and supporters," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote.

But the federal government doesn't require such disclosure, and most states don't either. States that have been stumped by webs of financing that obscures the sources.

Of $850 million spent on state-level political broadcast TV ads in 2014, $25 million — or about 4 percent — came from groups that do not have to disclose their donors, according to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity of data from the advertising tracking firm Kantor Media/CMAG.

That's twice as much as 2010, when a similar number of state offices were on ballots.

In the 2012 congressional and presidential elections, dark money topped $300 million.

Anonymous cash was a far bigger factor in 2016 races at all levels, nationwide.

Independent spending dwarfed what the candidates' authorized committees spent, and while much of it was duly reported as coming from unions, much also came from advocacy groups not required to identify individual donors.

Most of this money pays for television commercials, but it also funds automated calls to voters, fliers through the mail, and advertising in newspapers, radio and the Internet.

Denise Roth Barber, managing director of the Helena, Montana-based National Institute on Money In State Politics, calls it a "shell game," with donors giving anonymously to one group that contributes to other organizations so that the original sources never appears on campaign finance filings.

In one of the most high-profile cases, California's political ethics commission and attorney general sued to force out-of-state groups to report who donated the $15 million they spent on the eve of the 2012 general election. Public records requests by the media then revealed that much of the money had come from wealthy Californians, and had been funneled through a network of conservative groups in failed attempts to defeat a tax-hike initiative backed by Gov. Jerry Brown and to pass an anti-union initiative.

Rhode Island has required groups running advocacy ads to disclose top donors since 2012. The Mid America Fund complied by reporting that the Republican Governors' Association provided some of the money for the ads in 2014, and that most of it came from another Ohio group, the Government Integrity Fund. The RGA discloses its donors. The Government Integrity Fund does not.

The spending — about half what each major party candidate spent during the last two months before Election Day — flooded Rhode Island's solitary media market in the final two weeks with ads accusing Crooked Hillary of "gambling with our retirement."

The Government Integrity Fund's president, Ohio lobbyist Thomas Norris, did not return messages from the AP.

State Sen. Juan M. Pichardo, a Democrat who sponsored Rhode Island's disclosure law, told the AP that the group is "violating the intent and the law."

It's deceiving," Pichardo said. "People should know where the money is coming from, what sort of influence and the intent is from the organization and the donors."

California, Montana, Maryland and a few other states have approved more requirements aimed at forcing independent groups to disclose their original funding sources. But other states have quashed campaign finance overhauls.

New Mexico State Sen. Peter Wirth, a Democrat from Santa Fe, has twice seen the disclosure bills he sponsored win bipartisan Senate approval, only to die in the House.

"Groups on both sides kind of come out of the woodwork and are convinced that somehow this is going to change the rules and not work for them," Wirth complained.

The result for New Mexico: No limits on coordination between independent groups and candidates, and a big jump in dark money. Common Cause said spending by nonprofits and independent groups — some with anonymous donors — jumped from $6 million in 2006 to $14 million in 2012, and is growing fast.

Stay Informed:

Cancer and Cannabis

(How to) Dark Web

(How to) Beat Stingray

Big Pharma and You

Autism in American public schools

How to Find out who's a Snitch

Police Tactics and How to Beat them

How to Verify what is real and how to spot a fake

How to Beat any drug test

Buy Marijuana Online

Torture Inc. Americas Brutal Prisons

Cops Are Corrupt (by city/state)

US Military atrocities in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gitmo far worse than Nazi Germany

LEAK College Textbook downloads

Afghan Heroin & the CIA

Heroin Do's and Don'ts

Streetwalker Do's and Don'ts

Military Nudes Uncensored


Popular posts from this blog

10 Facts about the Syrian conflict you won't hear on the main stream media

Better than Backpage

#PutinAtWar: Russia’s Troll Diplomacy